Publications de l'Université Paris-Dauphine : IRISSO

• Méda D., (2022), ?????? - ????????????????, Nichifutsu Bunka, mars 2022, 91

• Prauthois L., Roth P-M., Spire A. (2021), Une judiciarisation inégale, in Emmanuelle Duwez ., Pierre Mercklé . (dir.), Un panel français : l'Etude longitudinale par Internet pour les sciences sociales (Elipss), Editions de l'INED, p. 165-184

• Théret B., Alary P., Blanc J., Desmedt L. (2021), French Monetary Theories. An anthology, Basingstoke

• Bullen C., Isnart C., Glevarec H., Saez G. (2021), Cultural Heritage and Associations in France: Reflections on a Ground-Breaking Investigation, Twenty Years On, Museum and Society, 19, 1

  This interview was carried out to mark the approaching twentieth anniversary of what has become a seminal text within French heritage studies: Le Patrimoine saisi par les associations (Heritage in the Hands of Associations). Ahead of its time, this work by the French sociologists Hervé Glevarec and Guy Saez shed light on a number of important yet little-studied dynamics concerning the interactions between the field of heritage and associations in France. Many of the aspects they outlined have become a common part of heritage making and a focus of heritage studies around the world. Somewhat surprisingly, there has been very little intellectual follow-up of Glevarec and Saez' pioneering work. As well as detailing the social context that led to the study and underlining some of the key findings, in the interview Glévarec and Saez point to some significant evolutions in political, intellectual and moral paradigms affecting contemporary cultural heritage production. The interview demonstrates the historical value of ethnographic and sociological studies which, when compared with more recent research, can help chart the extent of transformations of a social field over time..

• , Tra attuazione e dibattito: primi insegnamenti dalla legge francese del 2017 sul dovere di vigilanza delle imprese, Giornale di Diritto del Lavoro e di Relazioni Industriali, 43, 169, p. 37-51

  The essay examines the French law of March 2017 on the duty of supervision of multinational companies, through the lens of the main actors involved in the implementation process. The main thesis focuses on the "managerialization£ of the law carried out by professionals of supervision, internal and external to multinational companies, which risks influencing the way jurisprudence will interpret the substance of the supervisory obligations established by the same law.